Kim and Colleagues Publish Article with JAMA Network

Kim and Colleagues Publish Article with JAMA Network

Hyeoneui Kim, associate professor, co-authored an article entitled "Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research" with JAMA Network. Co-authors include Jihoon Kim, University of California; Elizabeth Bell, Tyler Bath, Paulina Paul,, and Anh Pham, all of University of California; Xiaoquian Jiang, University of Texas Health Science Center; Kai Zheng, University of California; and Lucila Ohno-Machado, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System.

Abstract:

Importance  Patients increasingly demand transparency in and control of how their medical records and biospecimens are shared for research. How much they are willing to share and what factors influence their sharing preferences remain understudied in real settings.

Objectives  To examine whether and how various presentations of consent forms are associated with differences in electronic health record and biospecimen sharing rates and whether these rates vary according to user interface design, data recipients, data and biospecimen items, and patient characteristics.

Design, Setting, and Participants  For this survey study, a data and biospecimen sharing preference survey was conducted at 2 academic hospitals from May 1, 2017, to September 31, 2018, after simple randomization of patients to 1 of 4 options with different layout and formats of indicating sharing preferences: opt-in simple, opt-in detailed, opt-out simple, and opt-out detailed.

Interventions  All participants were presented with a list of data and biospecimen items that could be shared for research within the same health care organization or with other nonprofit or for-profit institutions. Participating patients were randomly asked to select the items that they would share (opt-in) or were asked to select items they would not share (opt-out). Patients in these 2 groups were further randomized to select only among 18 categories vs 59 detailed items (simple vs detailed form layout).

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary end points were the percentages of patients willing to share data and biospecimen categories or items.

Results  Among 1800 eligible participants, 1246 (69.2%) who completed their data sharing survey were included in the analysis, and 850 of these patients (mean [SD] age, 51.1 [16.7] years; 507 [59.6%] female; 677 [79.6%] white) responded to the satisfaction survey. A total of 46 participants (3.7%) declined sharing with the home institution, 352 (28.3%) with nonprofit institutions, and 590 (47.4%) with for-profit institutions. A total of 836 (67.1%) indicated that they would share all items with researchers from the home institution. When comparing opt-out with opt-in interfaces, all 59 sharing choice variables (100%) were associated with the sharing decision. When comparing simple with detailed forms, only 14 variables (23.7%) were associated with the sharing decision.

Conclusions and Relevance  The findings suggest that most patients are willing to share their data and biospecimens for research. Allowing patients to decide with whom they want to share certain types of data may affect research that involves secondary use of electronic health records and/or biosamples for research.

Commentary on the article can be found here.

Scroll back to top automatically